Thursday, August 15, 2019

TRUE HISTORY: THE QUESTION OF REPARATIONS

JAZZMAN CHRONICLES:  TRUE HISTORY





TRUE HISTORY:  ORIGINAL SINS

My Heroes Have Always Killed Cowboys

By Jack Random


There has been some discussion of reparations for slavery as candidates vie to succeed Donald Trump as President of the United States.  All Americans should be taught the dark side of our history alongside the good for only then can we wipe the slate clean, turn the page and address the challenges of the future.  Only then can we have a candid discussion on the question of reparations not only for slavery but for the many sins of our past. 
There was a time when Manifest Destiny governed the history of America.  Those days are gone.  We know now that our nation was born in genocide and built on the backs of African American slaves.  We have chosen to ignore the fundamental truth for far too long.  Columbus was a killer.  Cortez was a killer.  We can no longer assume that those who stood in the beginning of our founding are heroes.  They are not.  They were in some cases heroic but they are not heroes today. 
The legacy of racism in America runs long and deep.  The father of our country was a slaveholder.  George Washington owned two hundred slaves.  To his credit he freed his slaves after his death.  Thomas Jefferson, who owned over 600 slaves, did not.  He infamously impregnated his slave mistress Sally Hemings, with whom he had five children.  He publicly condemned the barbarism of slavery and proposed a gradual emancipation, retraining and re-colonization of slaves to Africa but his intellectual opposition yielded to his financial interests.  He needed slaves to maintain his standing in a racist society.  Other slaveholder presidents include James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, Zachary Taylor, William Henry Harrison and Martin Van Buren. 

GEORGE WASHINGTON

George Washington did not chop down the cherry tree.  That was a myth invented by his first biographer.  Washington was not a super hero.  He was a man with all the flaws of humanity and many of the failings of his time.  He was not only America’s first president but also America’s first slaveholder president and the first to kill Native Americans.  He did so as a young man in the British army in the French and Indian War.  As president he set the policy of westward expansion that would become known as Manifest Destiny.  He wrote that he wanted to take Indian lands peaceably and at a fair price but he favored force whenever the natives refused.  The term he used for Indian removal was “extirpation.”  That term refers to uprooting and utter destruction.  Thus Washington can justly be characterized as the Founding Father of the Great American Genocide.  [1] 

JAMES MADISON

Credited as a primary framer of the constitution, James Madison purportedly believed in emancipation of the slaves but he did not free his own slaves and he infamously drafted that part of the constitution that gave slaves 3/5ths of a person value for purposes of apportioning congressional representation.  Without that provision – a provision that would poison congress until the Civil War and the 13th Amendment – slavery might well have been abolished decades sooner than it was.  At best Madison’s beliefs and policies on race were complicated and contradictory.  At worst he was hypocritically racist like most of his “progressive” contemporaries.  [2]

THOMAS JEFFERSON

Those of us who treasure the legacy of Jefferson’s words – we hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal – have learned to become apologists.  If you, we rationalized, lived in his times and under his circumstances, you also would have accepted the norms of those times.  It is more difficult to rationalize his sexual abuse of Sally Hemings though that also was a common practice in the days of slavery.  Moreover, despite his support of the Slave Trade Act of 1807 barring American participation in the international slave trade, Jefferson reportedly wrote that blacks were inferior to whites “in mind and body.”  [3, 4]  The more you look for Jefferson’s redemption, the stronger the case for impeachment grows. 

JAMES MONROE

James Monroe, fifth president and founder of the Monroe Doctrine, supported a movement headed by Speaker of the House Henry Clay to remove African slaves from the American continent and transport them back to Africa.  Monroe seized land on the West African coast for that purpose.  It would later become Liberia.  It should be noted that Abraham Lincoln, the Great Emancipator, also once supported repatriating slaves back to Africa. 

ANDREW JACKSON

The president most deified by the Trump White House and often pictured in the background of his presidential statements is Andrew Jackson.  The seventh president from the state of Tennessee, he made his name as a military leader in the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812.  He recruited and fought alongside Cherokee and Choctaw warriors, many of whom he grew up with, only to turn on them when the war was won.  Despite a decision by the Supreme Court upholding the independent Cherokee nation, Jackson enforced the Indian Removal Act by ordering the rounding up natives in Georgia and Tennessee and marching them to Indian Territory on what would become known as the Trail of Tears.  

ANDREW JOHNSON

The seventeenth president, succeeding the assassinated Lincoln, Andrew Johnson did everything in his power to undermine Reconstruction and the 13th Amendment.  He elevated slaveholders with amnesty and restored voting rights.  He nullified the order granting all emancipated slaves 40 acres and a mule.  He paved the way for the Jim Crow laws the deprived blacks of civil rights and voting rights for over a century.  For all that he did and his clear racist beliefs, Huffington Post gave him the honor as the most racist president in history – at least until now.  By my reckoning, he is the second most racist president named Andrew. 

WOODROW WILSON

This came as a recent revelation to me but it shouldn’t have been.  Known as the founding father of the United Nations, Wilson’s racism was well known to historians and those who knew him.  He was a defender of segregation at a critical time in race relations.  At the Versailles Convention in 1919 Wilson was credited with killing a Japanese proposal recognizing the principle of racial equality.  Born in Virginia, raised in Georgia and South Carolina, a descendant of confederate soldiers, he openly defended the Ku Klux Klan and is quoted in the infamous movie The Birth of a Nation:  “The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation…until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.”  President Wilson screened the racist screed at the White House. [5]

LYNDON JOHNSON

The president who did more than any other to fulfill the promise of civil rights was at heart a southerner.  He had no qualms about using the N word and reportedly used it a lot.  His term for the Civil Rights Act of 1957 was: the N bill.  Prior to his elevation to the vice presidency LBJ was a reliable member of the Dixiecrats.  When he nominated Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court he told his biographer:  “When I appoint a N to the bench, I want everyone to know he’s a N!”  He once told his chauffer Robert Johnson:  “No matter what you are called, N, you just let it roll off your back like water and you’ll make it.  Just pretend you’re a goddamn piece of furniture.”  Given Johnson’s attitude toward blacks, his legacy of civil rights may best be interpreted as a political strategy.  [6]

RICHARD NIXON

Like Donald Trump, Nixon reportedly did not believe he was racist but his words left no doubt.  The greatest of all mistakes Nixon committed was to leave a tape-recorded record of what he and those he communicated with really thought.  Of course, he did not believe it was a mistake at the time.  He believed it was an honest record of what civilized and educated individuals actually thought.  A conversation with president-to-be Ronald Reagan recently came to light.  It left no doubt that the conservative Republicans most venerate has secured a place on the list of racist presidents.  Nixon called numerous friends and advisors to quote his friend Reagan on the inferiority of blacks.  In fairness, Nixon was an equal opportunity bigot.  He frequently made disparaging remarks about Jews, Mexican Americans, Italian Americans and Irish Americans.  [7]

RONALD REAGAN

Reagan did not know he was being recorded so he spoke his mind.  He had just observed a United Nations vote in which he concluded – wrongly as it turned out – that delegates from the African nations had tipped the vote against American interests.  He compared the diplomats to monkeys and suggested that they looked uncomfortable in shoes.  Reagan said:  “Last night, I tell you, to watch this thing on television as I did.  To see those monkeys from African nations.  Damn them!  They’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes!”  Nixon laughed. [8]

MARK TWAIN

Samuel Clemens – aka Mark Twain – is a giant of American literature.  Much has been said and written about his liberal use of the N word in The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn.  At the time of Tom Sawyer the author had no convictions toward slavery either way but by the time he wrote Huck Finn he recognized the inhumanity and immorality of the institution.  [9] While his views toward blacks are subject to controversy, his attitude toward American Indians is not.  He openly challenged James Fennimore Cooper’s depiction of the noble savage and consistently described natives as disgusting people prone to drunkenness and violence.  Twain’s racism toward Native American has few defenders outside the white supremacist community. 

NATIVE GENOCIDE:  INDIAN WARS

When Shawnee war chief Tecumseh was away recruiting Choctaw warriors to unite against the white invasion in 1811, Indiana Governor and future president William Harrison ordered the attack and burning of Prophetstown on Tippecanoe River.  In the war that followed, Tecumseh was killed at the Battle of Thames and the hope of uniting the tribes died with him. 
By the end of the Indian Wars in the late 1800’s the Native American population had declined from an estimated 5 to 15 million in the time of Columbus to less than 238,000.  By any standard or definition, that is genocide on a grand scale and it was inflicted systematically and deliberately by a series of racist presidents and congressional leaders who believed the European white man was superior and therefore destined to rule the American continent from sea to shining sea. 
Among those who are celebrated for their participation in the Great American Genocide:  Davy Crockett, George Armstrong Custer, General Philip Sheridan and Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Benjamin Harrison, who disgraced the nation by awarding twenty medals of honor to the soldiers who massacred the disarmed Lakota Ghost Dancers at Wounded Knee. [10] Teddy Roosevelt aided the cause of hunting the buffalo to the edge of extinction in an effort to cut off the primary source of living for the plains Indians. 
The 26th president of the United States once said:  “I don’t go so far as to think that the only good Indians are dead Indians but I believe 9 out of 10 are and I shouldn’t like to inquire too closely in the case of the tenth.”  [11]
In the end no one in the American government escapes responsibility for acts of cruelty, betrayal and inhumanity to the tribes who cared for the land before the whites came. 
In 2012, in response to a lawsuit brought by representatives of the American Indians for mismanagement of tribal lands and accounts, under the presidency of Barrack Obama, the American government agreed to pay $3.4 billion in settlement to the surviving natives –  $1.9 billion toward Indian lands and $1.4 billion to individuals.  Whether this settlement is considered the fulfillment of treaty obligations or reparations for past inequity or both, it would seem to offer precedent and a case for reparations.  [12]

MEXICAN CESSATION & REPATRIATIONS

In the wake of the Mexican-American War circa 1848, Mexico gave up claim to more than half of its territory, a vast expanse of land including present day California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and part of Wyoming.  People of Mexican ancestry who did not wish to relocate south were granted citizenry.  In the latter half of the nineteenth century political instability in Mexico created a wave of immigration.  The Southern Pacific Railroad and other companies anxious to exploit a cheap labor force welcomed the immigrants and even sent envoys south to recruit immigrant workers. [13]
Anglo Americans resented the new workforce, giving rise to the stereotype of lazy, stupid Mexicans.  Angry mobs killed thousands of Latinos from California to Texas.  When America faced the Great Depression, white Americans blamed Mexican Americans for taking their jobs and the era of “repatriations” began.  An estimated two million people of Mexican descent were forcibly uprooted and sent south – regardless of their citizenship status.  Colorado ordered all Mexicans to leave the state in 1936 and erected a barrier on its southern border.  In one incident in 1931 Los Angeles police rounded up some 400 Mexican Americans without regard for legal status and shipped them to Mexico.  Adios, mes amigos! 
The Great Repatriation is another less violent form of genocide for which reparations should and must be considered. 

JAPANESE INTERNMENT

After Pearl Harbor President Franklin Roosevelt ordered the internment of over 110,000 Japanese Americans in camps scattered across the country.  Over sixty percent of the interned were American citizens.  The US Census Bureau assisted the administration’s efforts by providing confidential information and the Supreme Court upheld the internment with one of its more convoluted decisions in that it asked not to be considered precedent.  In 1980 President Jimmy Carter initiated a review of the internment and in 1988 President Ronald Reagan signed into law an official apology.  The law authorized payments of $20,000 to each survivor of the camps.  The government eventually dispersed over $1.6 billion to some 82,000 survivors.  That is equivalent to approximately $3.4 billion in today’s dollars.  The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 is an important legal precedent for historic reparations. [14]

SUBJUGATION OF WOMEN

White males were granted the right to vote in the year 1789 in the US Constitution.  African Americans were granted freedom with the thirteenth amendment in the year 1865.  Five years later they were granted the right to vote.  Fifty years later in the year 1920 women were granted their right to vote by the nineteenth amendment.  How do you begin to quantify fifty or one hundred and twenty years of the right to vote?  Does it have a monetary value?  What would this nation look like had women had the right to vote from the nation’s birth?  Would women still suffer from substandard wages?  Would women have equivalent power in the halls of congress?  Would women have equal standing in the world of business and finance? 

FOREIGN GRIEVANCES

Traditionally Americans have justified their engagements in foreign wars and interventions with rationalizations of the greater good.  The Cold War and the Domino Theory were used to justify an estimated three million dead in the Vietnam War.  Islamic terrorism, the September 11th attack and weapons of mass destruction were used to justify hundreds of thousands dead in the Iraq War.  Neither justification is valid.  Even if you believe in the Domino Theory, Ho Chi Minh should have been our ally in Vietnam.  He pleaded with the United States to abandon colonialism to no avail.  In any case, there can be no justification for the terror we reigned on that small Southeast Asian nation. 
The justification for the Iraq War is even thinner.  Iraq was a sworn enemy of Al Qaeda and possessed no weapons of mass destruction.  The Shock and Awe we brought down on those unfortunate people remains to this day but it is the shock of shame and the awe of knowing we were completely in the wrong. 
How do we gage our debt to Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and all those Latin American nations we attacked to secure our financial and strategic interests? 

REPARATIONS

The question of reparations is long overdue.  The precedent has been set.  We have acknowledged the sins of our forefathers.  They include genocide by extermination, genocide by relocation, slavery, systematic discrimination in all facets of life, denial of civil liberties and denial of the right to vote.  Aggrieved minorities are due retribution.  Justice demands payment for rightful grievances. 
There are problems of course.  There are many who refuse to acknowledge the plain truth.  There are many who choose to believe the mythology of American history.  There are those who claim to believe that discrimination against white Anglo-Americans is the leading problem of inequality.  These individuals may or may not be ignorant of the truth.  They may be victims of warped education and maleficent propaganda. 
We must do everything in our power to replace willful mythology with true history but it is not enough.  It is clearly impossible to even consider reparations as long as our government is actively engaged in crimes against humanity and abuses of human rights.  Only after we bring our current offenses to a halt can we begin to address reparations for the past. 
When that day comes we will acknowledge our debt and the solemn fact that it can never be fully repaid.  For now, we must go about the business of changing our government and reclaiming our nation.  For now we must be content to believe that the truth will prevail and to know that the debt once acknowledged will be addressed. 

Jazz. 


1.  “George Washington’s Tortuous Relationship with Native Americans.”  By Colin Calloway.  Zocalo, August 2, 2018.
2.  “James Madison’s Lessons in Racism.” By Noah Feldman.  New York Times Opinion, October 28, 2017. 
3.  “These are the most racist presidents.”  By Jess Bolluyt, Cheat Sheet, November 21, 2018. 
4.  “The Eleven Most Racist U.S. Presidents.”  Ibram X. Kendi, Contributor.  Huffington Post, May 28, 2017. 
5.  “Woodrow Wilson was extremely racist – even by the standards of his time.”  By Dylan Matthews.  Vox, November 20, 2015. 
6.  “Lyndon Johnson was a civil rights hero.  But also a racist.”  By Adam Serwer.  MSNBC, April 11, 2014.  Update April 12, 2018. 
7.  “A history of racism is woven into the US presidency.”  By Russell Contreras.  Associated Press, July 30, 2019. 
8.  “Ronald Reagan’s Long-Hidden Racist Conversation with Richard Nixon.”  By Tim Naftali.  The Atlantic, July 30, 2019. 
9.  “Mark Twain’s Inconvenient Truths.”  By Shelley Fisher Fishkin.  Stanford Magazine, November-December 2007. 
10.  “When Native Americans Were Slaughtered in the Name of Civilization.”  By Donald L. Fixico.  History, March 2, 2018.  Updated August 31, 2018.  
11.  “Teddy Roosevelt Laid Bare.”  By Tim Stanley.  History Today, Volume 62, Issue 3, March 2012. 
12.  “US finalizes $3.4 billion settlement with American Indians.”  CNN November 27, 2012.
13.  “The Brutal History of Anti-Latino Discrimination in America.”  By Erin Blakemore.  History, September 27, 2017.  Updated August 29, 2018. 
14.  “Senate Votes to Compensate Japanese American Internees.”  By Irvin Molotsky.  New York Times, April 21, 1988. 


Thursday, August 08, 2019

DEMOCRATIC DEBATE ROUND II: NARROWING THE FIELD

 JAZZMAN CHRONICLES:  DEFEATING TRUMP.




A LONG & WINDING ROAD TO THE WHITE HOUSE

ROUND TWO PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES

Narrowing the Field


By Jack Random



It is fascinating to watch the spectacle of talking heads, editorials and columnists opinionating on the relative success or failure of the candidates based more on their views and biases going in than on their performances on stage. 

It is admittedly difficult to avoid bias in assessing a debate – especially a debate among twenty contestants over two nights with as much organization and structure as a demolition derby.  The event tends to reward the loudest voice though anyone perceived as rude and obnoxious will suffer the harshest consequences. 

Both nights produced clear winners and losers despite the chaos.  Elizabeth Warren won the first night in a relatively calm event and Cory Booker won the second amidst outbreaks of anarchy.  Beyond that no candidates distinguished themselves in any positive way. 

NIGHT ONE:  TIM RYAN, BETO O’ROURKE, AMY KLOBUCAR, ELIZABETH WARREN, MARIANNE WILLIAMSON, JOHN HICKENLOOPER, PETE BUTTIGIEG, BERNIE SANDERS, JOHN DELANEY, STEVE BULLOCK.

NIGHT TWO:  MICHAEL BENNET, KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, JULIAN CASTRO, CORY BOOKER, JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, ANDREW YANG, TULSI GABBARD, JAY INSLEE, BILL DE BLASIO. 

ABSENT: ERIC SWALWELL. 

It is tempting to say that Eric Swalwell won by dropping out.  Having made a name with his sharp attacks on the misdeeds of our president, Swalwell should have been the impeachment candidate.  Instead, he gave his “pass the torch” rant and bowed out like a timid protégé who spoke out of turn.  Sorry, Mr. Biden, someone had to say it. 

In his place we got Governor Steve Bullock of Montana and the question is: Why?  He joins the ranks of Tim Ryan, John Hickenlooper, John Delaney and Michael Bennet.  They’re all here to tell us they too are members of the Democratic Party and they’re younger than old Joe Biden.  They know how to do “folks” speech. 

Michael Bennet gets the award for quote of the night when he said to Julian Castro:  “We actually agree on this.  You just said it better than I did.”  Well, Gov, that’s the problem.  There are others who say it better.  Let me introduce you to Amy Klobuchar.  Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the year of the moderate.  This year we only have room for one:  Old Joe Biden. 

On that note it’s time to say goodbye to Congressman Tim Ryan and former Congressman John Delaney – both of whom managed to make pragmatic sound bombastic.  No one demands more attention for less than 1% support than Delaney.  Goodbye Delaney.  You will not be missed. 

Goodbye governors Bullock and Hickenlooper.  We hardly knew you.  Goodbye Marianne Williamson.  I for one enjoyed your spiritual perspective.  Goodbye Mayor De Blasio.  I understand how hard it is to see a mayor of South Bend, Indiana, advance while the mayor of the Big Apple does not but that’s how it played out.  Hopefully, NYC will take you back. 

Sadly, we must also say goodbye to Senator Klobuchar.  Sadly, because she should have been the challenger to Joe Biden for the moderate wing of the party.  Sadly, because she never got the chance to be on stage with old Joe.  She’s sharp.  She knows what she’s talking about and she doesn’t stumble over own thoughts.  She’s what a moderate should look like but it looks to me like she’s gone. 

According to the Times of New York only seven candidates have met criteria for the next round of debates:  Biden, Booker, Harris, Buttigieg, O’Rourke, Sanders and Warren.  Three more are close:  Yang, Castro and Klobuchar.  And three have an outside chance:  Newcomer Tom Steyer, Tulsi Gabbard and Hickenlooper. 

The survivors will face down in September.  If there are more than ten they will take place on two nights. 

Here’s hoping the hammer comes down on more candidates than less.  We’ve seen enough to know that the contest will come down to Old Joe, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders.  Five is a good number for a debate.  These five represent the whole of the party:  Biden is old school.  He appeals to those who pine for Obama and don’t mind that his age is visibly impacting his performance.  Warren and Bernie represent the progressive wing of the party.  They won’t try to moderate their positions.  They know what they believe and they hold strong.  Booker and Harris are moderate progressives.  They’re willing to bend but they are capable of wielding great personal power. 

Some on the left of the political spectrum may be pleased that Representative Tulsi Gabbard took on the role of hit-woman to Kamala Harris.  She accused Harris of deliberately withholding evidence to affect the execution of a death row inmate – a felony – and keeping prisoners behind bars to exploit slave labor.  Never mind the accusation that she enforced the marijuana laws.  We may disagree with it but that was her job. 

I suppose we should thank Gabbard for hurling the kind of accusations that the Trump machine will but it did not look good.  It looked like a hit job.  It looked rehearsed and deliberate.  It hurt Harris but it also hurt Gabbard. 

I went into these debates a Gabbard supporter.  Now I have to wonder about her agenda.  She was the anti-war candidate and I cherished every moment of her deliberations on “regime change” wars.  Now she looks like an attack dog. 

Beto O’Rourke has an identity problem.  There are others who represent the same ideas but are more qualified for the presidency.  His whole case for being the Democratic nominee comes down to Texas.  But he lost his only attempt at winning a statewide race in Texas.  Moreover, there is a Texas senate seat open in 2020.  Drop this ill-advised run and use your substantial resources to take that seat.  I’ve said before and will again:  Taking the US Senate is equally important if not more so than taking the presidency. 

Pete Buttigieg represented himself admirably but it’s time to stop.  We know he represents an under-represented minority but he has never won a statewide election.  If there were no one else to carry the banner I would say carry on.  But there are others.  He has not distinguished his policies from the other contenders. 

Kirsten Gillibrand provided one of the most bizarre appeals to the black vote ever recorded.  It is true that she understands white privilege and can speak to those who exploit white privilege but that is unlikely to persuade a single African American voter.  Gillibrand is bright and ambitious but this is simply not her year. 

Andrew Yang is one of the most impressive neophyte politicians ever to run for president.  His ideas demand to be heard.  He is right.  Technology is already supplanting job exportation as the leading cause of job loss in this nation.  He alone has a plan to cope with that daunting future and the other candidates need to begin addressing the problem.  Yang belongs in the next cabinet and his ideas belong in the debate. 

Washington’s Governor Jay Inslee represented his cause well.  It’s a shame that he does not possess the charisma that would inspire the masses.  He’s right of course.  Climate change should be the overriding issue.  However, not enough of us think it’s a winning ticket.  Inslee should be the next head of the Environment Protection Agency. 

Julian Castro also distinguished himself.  He thrust the immigration debate into the spotlight and demanded that the other candidates take a stand.  As the only Hispanic candidate there is a place for him as the number two on the ticket.  He simply has not managed to garner the kind of support that would elevate him to the upper tier. 

That brings us to the real contenders. 

Can anyone really say that Joe Biden did a good job?  Come on.  Really.  Read a transcript of his statements.  It’s hard to say but Old Joe just doesn’t have what it takes to be the next president.  He was a good vice president to the first African American president in history.  That should be enough. 

I love Bernie as much as most people love Old Joe but it’s time for Bernie’s supporters to accept that he’s a little too old, too crotchety and maybe too angry to take the show all the way home.  Last time he was great.  He was a champion of the people and I was proud to march in his army.  This time there is an alternative and I believe even Bernie knows it. 

Kamala Harris was knocked down a rung in this debate.  It shook her.  She tends to let her frustration show when she’s stung.  It showed.  She got back up and threw some good punches but the air of invincibility shattered.  She’ll remember Tulsi Gabbard and Biden’s bizarre reference to 1000 prisoners being freed.  Both cases are far more nuanced. 

Cory Booker emerged in this round as the one to watch.  He was the one to look into Joe Biden’s eyes and take him down.  Where Kamala stumbled – dazed by a sucker punch from the sidelines – Booker stood strong.  He still has a lot to explain about his policies as mayor of Newark but Biden is not the man to challenge him. 

That leaves Elizabeth Warren.  She is the heir apparent to Bernie’s movement.  Where Bernie tends to become frazzled and appears angry, Warren lays it down in plain fact.  She has the passion, the knowledge and the energy.  She represents the true progressive wing of the party and she does not compromise.  Still, she was not fool enough to label herself a socialist. 

It’s going to be a barnburner – a knockdown drag out fight to the finish.  So far Warren has not found a way to gain significant support of the black community.  That poses a problem she must overcome.  But she has gotten the attention of African Americans with her openness to reparations, her proposals for rebuilding inner cities and her vibrant defense of voting rights and civil rights.  Already she has made inroads that Bernie failed to make in his unsuccessful bid to pull the nomination away from Hillary. 

Whatever happens, the field will narrow and one candidate will emerge to take on Donald Trump.  If you’re a true progressive your primary interest is that it should not be Joe Biden in some misguided notion of electability.  Your next goal is to nominate Warren or Sanders.  If you’re a moderate, you’re rooting for Old Joe but you’ll be fine with Booker or Harris. 

Jazz. 

Note:  This article appears on OpEd News.


“Only Seven Candidates Have Qualified for the Next Democratic Debate” by Maggie Astor.  New York Times, August 1, 2019. 

“Fact Check: Did Kamala Harris block evidence that would have freed inmates?” by Emily Cadei and Bryan Anderson.  Sacramento Bee, July 31, 2019.


Saturday, August 03, 2019

MEDICARE FOR ALL IS JUST THE FIRST STEP

 JAZZMAN CHRONICLES

 

  


FALSE FRONT:  FRAMING THE MEDICARE DEBATE

MEDICARE FOR ALL IS THE FIRST STEP




A heated debate has broken out among the Democratic presidential contenders pitting Medicare for All advocates against the moderates who generally want to supplant the Affordable Care Act with a public option.  If we have learned anything from the Obamacare experience it is that compromise measures rarely fulfill their promise.  Obamacare did not achieve anywhere near full coverage and the cost of care continues to rise. 
Why would anyone choose to pay for medical insurance when medical services are free?  It turns out there are people who opt for private insurance even when public insurance is provided free of cost.  We see throughout Europe where governments provide universal healthcare but a certain percentage of the population nevertheless purchases private insurance.  There is nothing inherently wrong with skipping to the front of the line with Cadillac coverage.  But if someone is willing to pay thousands of dollars a year so that they don’t have to sit in a waiting room with ordinary people, let them pay a price.  If millionaires and billionaires want to pay for privileged care let them help improve the system for everyone else.  Let them pay a privileged care fee equal to ten, fifteen or twenty percent of the cost of coverage to supplement the medical system. 
There is a shortage of doctors in this country.  We need competent and well-trained doctors not only in the cities where doctors command top salaries but especially in the rural communities across the nation.  The privileged care fee should be substantial enough to provide educational opportunities for medical students who are willing to relocate to high need areas.  The fees could also be used to assist hospitals that are struggling to survive under the dictates of a profit-motivated system. 
Eventually we need to take the profit completely out of health and medical care.  Until then we will continue to see the spectacle of medical personnel demanding credit cards in the emergency centers of private hospitals.  This would not happen to anyone anywhere else in the civilized world where health and medical are considered fundamental rights. 
To those who say we can’t pay for it, I reply:  We are already paying for it and much, much more.  According to Questex – a media company serving the corporate elite – the top eight insurance companies generated profits in excess of seven billion dollars on income in excess of $132 billion during the third quarter of 2018.  Extrapolating that amount to one year that’s an annual profit topping twenty-eight billion on revenues of more than $500 billion for only eight companies. 
How many lives did they save for that extraordinary amount of money?  Absolutely none.  In fact, it is more appropriate to inquire:  How many lives were lost because the insurance companies did their job well?  Their job is to bolster profits by cutting costs and increasing revenues.  They accomplish that by cutting medical services to people and jacking up the premiums and co-pays of their policies.  We don’t know how many lives were lost due to insurance companies denying coverage but we do know that many of our fellow citizens have been forced to give up or cut back on their medicines because they could not afford them.  We all know someone who was forced to delay or forego a needed operation or medical procedure because the cost was prohibitive. 
Insurance companies are rewarded for denying services and those who are responsible for carrying out the decree are given bonuses and promotions. 
It is easy to see that if we eliminated the insurance industry we would gain billions and billions of dollars to fortify and rebuild the healthcare system.  The employees in the insurance industry are extremely competent and highly educated people.  We could put many of them to work exposing waste and finding savings in the healthcare system.  We could hire them to uncover money-laundering operations in the real estate business.  We could find any number of useful endeavors for those who are unable to find employment in the private sector. 
To continue arguing that we cannot afford healthcare is an affront to common sense.  We cannot afford to continue a system that serves money interests to the detriment of health and medical care. 
Medicare for All is only a first step but it is a vital step.  We should then take aim at the private for-profit hospitals.  The American Hospital Association estimates that 18% of hospitals in the United States are for-profit institutions.  They concentrate on the most profitable areas of specialty – like rehabilitation – and cater to the privileged.  They often take the best medical personnel and deprive communities of needed resources. 
Anyone who has visited a hospital in recent years knows they are counting costs when you walk in the door.  The patient in an emergency room is facing a personal crisis but that does not prevent hospital personnel from hounding the patient for proof of insurance or a credit card. 
There has to be a better way. 
Reforming the medical service delivery system will be every bit as complicated as health insurance reform but it must be addressed.  Government must play a role in establishing and supporting services in underserved communities and no one should be hounded for payment in a hospital emergency room. 


“Big Eight health insurers rake in more than $7 billion in Q3, setting up strong finish to 2018,” by Rose Meltzer.  Fierce Healthcare.  November 19, 2018. 

Friday, July 26, 2019

RECLAIMING AMERICA: IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT!

THE LONG WAY HOME:  RECLAIMING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY



THE FIRST STEP:  IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT

By Jack Random



There can be no way around it.  In the year 2019 the only way forward and the only chance we have of reclaiming democracy in the land of the free is the impeachment of the president.  The election of Donald J. Trump is a symptom of systemic failure and one of such catastrophic dimensions that it must be corrected before anything of substance can be accomplished. 
If we allow this president to continue without confronting the restraint and distraction that impeachment proceedings provide we will invite disaster on multiple fronts.  We have already glimpsed a sampling of what the Trump administration intends:  Closing the border to all asylum seekers in violation of international law, punitive measures like family separation and child abuse, evisceration of civil rights and voting rights, systemic disenfranchisement of minority voters, alienation and extortion of democratic allies, annihilation of labor rights, elevation of dictatorships, nuclear proliferation, normalization of racism and prejudice, reversal of policies protecting the air and water, a rollback in health and medical services, corruption on a scale unrivaled since the Teapot Dome scandal and elimination of assistance to the poor. 
We have witnessed all this from a restrained Trump administration.  He has until now operated under a pervasive cloud of investigation for high crimes and misdemeanors.  The president hopes and perhaps believes that the cloud lifted in the wake of the gutless and ineffectual Mueller Report.  Because the special prosecutor was less than animated and compelling in his testimony before congress and the American people, we are expected drop all doubt and suspicions regarding his relentless attempts to coordinate his campaign with the Russian propaganda apparatus in defrauding an American presidential election.  We are expected to ignore his repeated and often successful attempts to cover up his actions and those of his family and staff in conspiring with the Russians.  We are expected to turn away from compelling evidence that our president and his family aint nothing more than money launderers for corrupt foreign governments. 
If we fail to hold this president accountable we are not only legitimizing and sanctioning the most corrupt and illegitimate president in history, we are also opening the door to a second term.  If we allow that to happen we will be compelled to bear witness to the high crimes and misdemeanors that an unrestrained President Trump will commit.  If we allow this incompetent crook another term he will undoubtedly appoint at least one more Supreme Court justice and the impact of his presidency will outlive us all. 
If we fail to impeach the president before the coming election he may well be tempted to start a war in Venezuela or Iran in a desperate attempt to win reelection.  Frankly, he may be tempted to do so anyway.  But if we know anything about this president it is that he is obsessed with the news of the day.  Among the advantages of a constant barrage of impeachment hearings – highlighting new information regarding Trump Tower Moscow, 666 Fifth Avenue NYC, Deutsche Bank and money laundering operations connecting the oligarchs of Putin’s Russia, the ruthless despots of Saudi Arabia and Trump real estate operations – is that they will serve as a distraction and Trump will be unable to wrap his mind around anything else. 
If Trump does move us to war you can be sure it will not go against the interests of the Saudis or the Russians.  If he does give the order for political reasons there is a very real possibility that his commanders will refuse to comply.  That is how low this presidency has sunk.  The generals that Trump once held in such high esteem have seen behind the curtain.  They have seen him kowtow to the Russian dictator.  They have witnessed his cowardice when confronted with the violent crimes of a Saudi prince.  They know who he is. 
If we do not impeach the president we have taken his criminal conduct off the table.  We have removed his corruption and character from the topics of debate.  We have given him the kind of aid and comfort only the gutless Democrats can provide.  We will have matched the Republican Party in complicity. 
We must impeach the president.  Without regard for the trial in the hallowed chambers of the United States Senate, we must impeach the president.  We must impeach the president because he is guilty beyond all doubt and by any honest reckoning.  We must impeach the president to restore the fundamental value of American democracy. 
We must impeach the president to assert now and forever that no one is above the law and no one is beyond the reach of justice. 
The idea that some internal Justice Department memo can overrule the basic tenet of judicial decree is ludicrous and offensive. [1] All presidents should be held to account for criminal conduct without delay and without exception.  This president has scorned justice and turned the office of the Attorney General into a sycophant for the chief executive.  It must not stand. 
The president of the United States is guilty of high crimes and conduct not only worthy of but demanding impeachment. 

1.  The president through his agents conspired with agents of the Russian government to defraud the 2016 presidential election. 

The Mueller Report chronicles over one hundred interactions between the Trump campaign and Russian agents.  The Trump campaign provided polling data to target key voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – the very states that turned the election.  The Russian propaganda machine in turn provided fake news to targeted voters through fake social media accounts.  Before the eyes of the American public, candidate Trump incorporated the daily WikiLeaks reports into his campaign.  Russia provided the attack data, WikiLeaks laundered it and Trump employed it on the campaign trail.  This is what collusion, coordination and conspiracy look like. 

2.  The president and his agents repeatedly lied to the public, the FBI and Congress to cover up their interactions with Russian agents. 

Trump stated point blank he had no business dealings whatsoever with Russia.  That was a lie.  He stated he had no interactions with the Russians.  That was a lie.  The truth is he was trying to negotiate a deal for a Trump Tower in Moscow even while he was campaigning.  Reports have it he wanted to gift Vladimir Putin one entire floor of the tower.  The truth is he had many dealings with Russian agents concerning laundering money for real estate deals in Florida.  The truth is we have only uncovered the tail of the elephant when it comes to laundering dirty money from Russian oligarchs for their supreme leader.  The truth is Trump authored a misleading statement for his son to explain the meeting in Trump Tower.  The truth is Trump is willing to throw his own son to the wolves if it serves his interests. 

3.  The president willingly engaged in behavior that would subject him to extortion by foreign agents in Russia and Saudi Arabia because of his and his family’s hidden interests and criminal activity. 

Son-in-law Jerrod Kushner received untold millions to save the family business from certain bankruptcy due to one of the worst investments in the history of New York City.  The record will show that the Saudi’s loaned Kushner a great deal of money when no legitimate banking interest would and that Donald J. Trump helped broker the deal.  While we do not yet know what the Saudis expected in return we do know that Trump vetoed legislation blocking a sell of arms to Saudi Arabia.  We also know that Trump excused compelling evidence that the crown prince of Saudi Arabia ordered the killing and dismemberment of a prominent journalist. 
We have not yet begun to uncover the Trump money laundering operation.  We need to begin the impeachment process to gain access to his financial records, his tax returns and his accounts in the notorious Deutsche Bank as well as the Bank of Cypress where his Treasury Secretary Wilbur Ross was once chief executive. 

4.  The president failed to act to defend the nation’s electoral integrity from an overt attack by a foreign adversary. 

Never mind that his failure to defend American democracy serves his own political and financial interests.  The president has alternatively refused to acknowledge Russian interference, implied that there is nothing wrong with foreign interference and pretended that it had no impact.  He has done absolutely nothing to ensure that it will not happen again.  He is a president that places no value on the integrity of the ballot.  He has done everything in his power to block minority voters and tip the balance in his favor.  He steadfastly refuses to support legislation that would require a paper trail in the event of electronic ballot tampering.  He pushed hard for a citizenship question on the census that is designed to suppress the Hispanic vote, resulting in reduced funds for minority districts and under representation of minority voters.  His admiration for foreign dictators and disdain for our own democracy is alone grounds for impeachment. 

5.  The president has intentionally imposed policies resulting directly in crimes against humanity on the southern border. 

We have all seen the photos, the videos and heard the testimonials of children being separated from their parents for the “crime” of seeking asylum in the United States.  This nation has long offered refuge to individuals seeking to escape discrimination, inhuman treatment and unconscionable violence in their own lands.  We value immigration because the founders of our independent democracy were themselves refugees seeking to escape intolerance in their native land.  Though we cannot neglect the intolerance, violence and discrimination that our founders dealt to Native and African Americans, we cannot allow any president to close the border by practicing inhuman and inhumane treatment of innocent children and families to dissuade them from seeking and claiming asylum. 
It has been a long time since anyone in our government demanded that individuals who dissent from the majority view should leave the country.  That is the very definition of un-American yet this president made that request of four members of congress.  In so doing he has demonstrated an intolerance that crosses the boundaries of inhumanity and demonstrates unfitness for office. 

6.  The president has profited from the presidency in violation of constitutional prohibitions against accepting gifts or equivalent items of value. 

The president and his family have collected large sums of money from the family hotels and business ventures.  They have accepted loans from foreign interests and encouraged corporate interests to invest in Trump business concerns, including stays at Mar-a-Lago and Trump International Hotel – the old Post Office – in Washington D.C.  The president has somehow persuaded the military and government officials to spend millions for stays and unnecessary refueling at Trump properties in Scotland and Ireland. 
Trump business ventures have made record profits at Trump Tower in NYC as well as memberships at Trump country clubs and his Florida resort.  Every time Trump holds an event at one of his properties, profits soar.  Corporations and foreign governments courting the Trump administration’s favor book rooms at his Washington hotel and spend lavishly.  Trump has zealously guarded his financial records, including his tax returns, so that we do not know the full extent of his profiteering but we certainly know enough.  Open Secrets has estimated that Trump business interests have received in excess of $35 million from Republican Party organizations since becoming president.  Open the books and we will learn how boldly the president has sold his office. [2]

7.  The president attempted to extort the president of Ukraine by withholding military aid in exchange for compromising information on a political rival. 

Shortly after special investigator Robert Mueller’s listless testimony before congress, the president withheld congressionally mandated military assistance to Ukraine and requested on a phone call to President Volodymyr Zelensky that the Ukrainian government re-investigate the business dealings of Hunter Biden, son to former vice president Joe Biden.  At the time of the call Joe Biden was clearly the leading candidate for the Democratic Party presidential nomination.  [3, 4]
While the underlying story should offer cause for doubting Biden’s squeaky-clean reputation and his claim of electability, that President Trump would consider it acceptable to withhold allocated aid for political advantage even after an investigation of his dealings with Russia in their attempt to interfere in a presidential election, suggests that this president is far beyond redemption.  He truly believes the Mueller Report vindicated him.  It absolutely did not.  He truly believes he can conspire with any foreign government to interfere in our elections.  The law says otherwise.  He truly believes he is above the law.  He is not. 

Let us stipulate that you cannot and should not be impeached for being a being a man of substandard character.  Let us stipulate that you cannot and should not be impeached for despicable behavior toward women – even if that behavior may have included criminal liability.  Let us stipulate that you cannot and should not be impeached for being a common con man and a crook. 
Let us focus on what he has done and why he is a danger to the nation.  Let us place no value on what the United States Senate may or may not do.  It is sufficient that we compel each and every senator to stand with us or stand with the crook in the Oval Office.  If we value our democracy, if we value our system of justice, if we value human rights and common decency, we must impeach the president. 


1. “Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History.”  By Walter Dellinger.  Lawfare, June 18, 2018.

2. Open Secrets: Center for Responsive Politics.  “All the President’s Profiting.”  Federal Election Commission Data released June 10, 2019. 

3. “Trump pressed Ukraine leader to investigate Biden, memo reveals.”  By David Smith.  The Guardian, September 25, 2019. 

4. “As vice president, Biden said Ukraine should increase gas production.  Then his son got a job with a Ukrainian gas company.”  By Michael Kranish and David L. Stern.  Washington Post, July 22, 2019. 


Jack Random is the author of the Jazzman Chronicles.